On Apr 6, 5:04 am, "Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod)"
<sennaj...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2:33 pm, "Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod)"
>
> <sennaj...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > I was [also] thinking about a weaker version of
> > jumper, where diagonally it would move like
> > a bishop (without the ability of leaping
> > over pieces) but finally I decided on
> > simplicity of the rules. Even vertically
> > and horizontally one could demand that no
> > piece, which stands on the same color square
> > obstructs the jumper.
>
> Make it: ... Even vertically and horizontally one
> could demand that EVERY piece, which stands on the
> SAME color square obstructs the jumper (from
> moving to any square beyond it).
>
> Anyway, let simply jumper jump diagonally,
> vertically and horizontally to any unoccupied
> square of the same color as the jumper's square
> color just before it moves.
Try it out and see how well it works.
|
