Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Abstract (perfect information, pure strategy) > Re: Fischer's d...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 23 Topic 580 of 669
Post > Topic >>

Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no chess on TV now?

by "David Kane" <davidekane@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 13, 2008 at 08:54 AM

"David Damerell" <damerell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:KyA*pRK9r@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Quoting  David Kane <davidekane@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>>"David Damerell" <damerell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>At what point in a football game is the position definitely drawn, such
>>>that neither team might score a final goal, but it remains possible to
>>>"toss a coin" and let one side win?
>>The teams agree that if the score is tied and there is one minute left
>>they toss a coin. Loser gives up a goal.
>
> Who's tossing this coin and communicating the decision to all the
players
> in considerably less than a minute, none of whom will blab or decline to
> participate in the fiddle?

I think it would be in principle no more difficult for a soccer team to
pull
this off without suspicion than it would be for chess players. Of course,
it would be difficult for both.

The point is that the current scoring system produces collusion
in chess that nobody disputes. It *is* part of chess' tradition to
have unplayed draws. While I might grant that people should be on the
look out for these far-fetched theoretical possibilities that Mr.
Richerby raises, they should not be considered as serious
objections absent *any* sup****ting evidence.



>
>>That strategy, though illegal and contrary to the tradition of the
s****t,
>>has a positive return with the scoring systems used in many soccer
>>leagues.
>
> West Germany v Austria, 1982 World Cup, is (an example of) another
problem
> with your argument that this sort of thing does not happen in football
and
> therefore would not happen in chess.
> -- 

In the chess world, the prearranged draw with the purpose of staying ahead
of 
the rest
of the field is routine with the *present* scoring system. Sadly it does
not
elicit much outrage. There are also a few examples of players throwing
games
but those are far rarer, and are condemned. That is why an argument based
on losing ~1/4 of your games on purpose in return for winning another ~1/4
by 
fraud
is so ridiculous.




> David Damerell <damerell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Distortion Field!
> Today is First Gloucesterday, March.
 




 23 Posts in Topic:
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
remysun2000@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-03-09 22:20:52 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
"Robin King" &l  2008-03-10 21:30:04 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
David Richerby <davidr  2008-03-12 13:24:21 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
"David Kane" &l  2008-03-12 10:40:40 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
David Damerell <damere  2008-03-12 18:31:18 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
"David Kane" &l  2008-03-12 17:05:36 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
David Damerell <damere  2008-03-13 13:25:16 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
"David Kane" &l  2008-03-13 08:54:53 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
David Damerell <damere  2008-03-13 16:55:48 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
"David Kane" &l  2008-03-13 10:43:12 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
David Richerby <davidr  2008-03-14 00:18:51 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
David Damerell <damere  2008-03-14 13:11:33 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
Kenneth Sloan <Kenneth  2008-03-14 12:16:16 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
"David Kane" &l  2008-03-18 10:05:42 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
David Richerby <davidr  2008-03-13 17:29:00 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
"David Kane" &l  2008-03-13 10:46:40 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
Chris Mattern <syscjm@  2008-03-17 01:54:34 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
David Richerby <davidr  2008-03-23 02:05:43 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
Phil Carmody <thefatph  2008-03-23 11:50:59 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
"Chess One" <  2008-03-23 08:08:11 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
David Richerby <davidr  2008-03-23 15:33:46 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
"Chess One" <  2008-03-23 12:20:33 
Re: Fischer's death again begs the question: Why is there no che
"David Kane" &l  2008-03-23 08:19:54 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 18 20:45:29 CDT 2008.