Re: New Game: Torus

On Feb 8, 9:41 am, nickobe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> I agree that the shape which is formed when you bring the edges
> together is the same (a torus) in either case, but it seems there is a
> difference, specifically in which edge cells are considered adjacent
> to cells on the opposite edge for the NS player.   For example, using
> an 11x11 rhombus and its standard notation, a1 and a11 can be
> considered adjacent, but in the other system a1 would be considered
> adjacent to, e.g. g11.  Right?
>
> So I'm wondering if this definitional change fixes the game.

does anyone know if my proposal, repasted here, (ie redefining the
connection between the NS edges of the board), fixes the game?  It
looks like it does to me.  insight?