In article <8NOWh.7370$H_5.5579@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
"Phlip" <phlipcpp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Miss Elaine Eos wrote:
> >> Ruby will never run
> >> faster than Lua, because Lua is somewhat more difficult to program.
> > I do not understand what you are saying, here.
[Stuff that talked about hard & soft languages, snipped.]
To clarify: I do not understand what you mean by "Ruby will never fun
faster than Lua, because Lua is somewhat more difficult to program."
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which
sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
|
