In article <1168587013.122116.50570@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
bvanevery@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> Doesn't look like anyone really posts in c.g.d.* anymore. From a
> traffic standpoint, 1 newsgroup would do. Also, if everyone was under
> 1 tent, perhaps it could set the stage for a moderated newsgroup
> somewhere down the road.
> Google Groups only allows cross-posting to 5 groups, so I didn't
> include c.g.d.p.algorithms. No great loss.
Leave well enough alone IMO. We had a single newsgroup once, and IIRC
you were a main force in splitting it up! Why insist on endless churn?
I'd suggest that those concerned about traffic all crosspost to .misc,
and if that becomes the single de facto newsgroup, so be it.
There's not much spam, and with a proper newsreader multiple groups are
quite convenient.
- Gerry Quinn


|