"Dan Lingman" <dlingman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Xns9955F3F26F27Edlingmanrogerscom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Tom Sloper" <tsloper@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:EoydnTbOvKZgMevbnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Last posted June 11, 2007
>> Most recent updates to the FAQs (since the June 11, 2007 posting):
>>
>> 1. FAQ 24 - Altered what I wrote about lying scam artists, in response
>> to a lawsuit threat.
>>
>
> Sigh. I liked your older version better. Archive.org didn't have any
> version with item 21 in it, but Google hadn't updated their cache yet...
waybackmachine.org has a version with an older 21 in it.
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.sloperama.com/advice/lesson24.htm
> It's a general rule of thumb to never give people money to find you a
job.
> Even legit headhunters don't hit up the job seeker - they get their pay
> from the employer, in exchange for providing a filtered list of resumes.
>
> I suggest caution though, (or at least that you seek real legal advice
on
> this) cause even your watered down version could be taken as diverting
> revenue from them, and still leave you open to a lawsuit. I'd actually
> suggest removing the domains entirely, or phrase it so that it's
something
> like: I recommend that you do not send any money to any site that offer
> you
> paid member****p to assist in landing a game testing job. Again, suggest
> running the phrasing past a laywer.
>
> Keep the updates coming though. It seems that there is little being
asked
> that you don't have an answer for, so the rate of new items (other than
> small tweaks to existing faqs) has dwindled.
>
> Dan.
|
