Shatner for Wrath? Wrath of Con?
Xocyll wrote:
>
> Anadriel <AnadrielNOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> looked up from reading the entrails of
> the **** spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:
>
> >It spake, on the day Wed, 21 Jan 2004 08:39:14 -0500. Amzingly, "u"
> ><u@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
> >
> >>You know, for such a tolerant lot, you Canadians are ruthless when
dealing
> >>with each other.
> >>
> >>
> >>Anex.....Explodeazon, I blame it all on Shania Twain.
> >
> > That's right! Fear our Canuck wrath! We shall send the might of the
> >north winds upon our enemies, and bacon to our friends.
>
> Bah, that's not true Canuck wrath.
>
> Sending Shatner down to serenade them, that's Wrath!
>
> Xocyll
> --
> I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
> a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
> Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
> FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr
|
