On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:20:17 -0700 (PDT), jgarbuz
<jgarbuz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Apr 14, 8:13 pm, HHW <coaster132...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Apr 14, 7:52 pm, hru...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Herman Rubin) wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > In article <11a7045b2leck3famk88fr6qishngj8...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> > Eli Grubman <eli.grub...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> > >On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:36:50 -0700 (PDT),jgarbuz
>> > ><jgar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > >>On Apr 14, 9:35 am, HHW <coaster132...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > >>> On Apr 14, 12:46 am, flav...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> > >>> > On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:25:19 -0700 (PDT),jgarbuz
>> > >>> > <jgar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > >>> > >On Apr 13, 7:57 pm, HHW <coaster132...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> > .................
>> > >>She's one of a kind, thank God. A real dingbat. Now you know why
>> > >>Judaism discourages conversions.
>
>> > >I go a step further than most Jews. I discourage converts *after*
>> > >they've converted!
>> > >Eli
>>
>> > This is EXPLICITLY prohibited in Judaism.<<
>
>That is true. Once someone is in the tribe, he or she is a full
>member. There are no half members. You are either in, or out. It is
>against Jewish law to in any way, shape or form discriminate or be
>biased against a convert. Ruth, the many times great grandmother of
>King David, whose lineage Christians claim Jesus descended from, was
>the prototypical convert.
Why is there no prohibition regarding mentioning that Ruth was a
c*****t?
Eli
|
