On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 11:08:16 -0400, "Frank Arthur" <Art@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>"Eli Grubman" <eli.grubman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:1vjgv3tvcgm1svbmhrfu2ltq2upgdcrv3p@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 22:43:56 -0400, "Patrick Keenan" <test@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>"Anonymous" <xor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:ca90e27407cf98802f13e4c7252c914a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Sat, 05 Apr 2008 01:45:53 -0500,
>>>> <YeidncJg8PG8vWranZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> kmcvay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Flushed down the old McVay for the big stinky jew it was
>>>>
>>>> Kenneth "***** Lips" McVay Attends Gay Pride Parades
>>>
>>>As do millions of other people. As they say, so what?
>>>
>>>The estimated attendance for the Chicago pride parade for 2007 was
>>>nearly
>>>half a million people. In Atlanta in 2003 attendance was nearly
>>>300,000, in
>>>Toronto it's regularly around a million or more; 2004 was re****ted
>>>as 1.2
>>>million.
>>>
>>>However, the Toronto Taste of the Danforth festival also drew close
>>>to a
>>>million or so people. Does that make all those who attended Greek?
>>>
>>>If you're suggesting that attendance at a pride parade signifies
>>>homo***uality, then you are also saying that homo***uality is far
>>>more
>>>common than anyone else suggests.
>>
>> It certainly suggests condoning and endorsing homo***uality. And
>> that
>> is a problem which is becoming more common.
>>
>> Eli
>
>And exactly what the "problem" is?
Acceptance of homo***uality as a viable alternative to hetero***uality
instead of as a ***ual disorientation.
>Don't you think other people have
>the right to their own opinions, beliefs and mores or do you think
>everyone must follow Eli?
No and yes.
Eli
|
