John Secker wrote:
> In article <3FD0C6BF.6020305@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, sergio
> <senza_nome2001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
>
>>
>>
>> John Secker wrote:
>>
>>> In article <3FCE2F0E.2060305@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, sergio
>>> <senza_nome2001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
>>>
>>>>> A "terrorist" is technically someone who attacks civilian targets in
>>>>> order to spread mass fear. That wouldn't include most of the
Chechen
>>>>> fighters.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> oh really? how do you call people that take civilians as hostages in
>>>> hospitals, schools, buses and so on and murder them or simply
>>>> destroyed
>>>> entire buildings and so on?
>>>>
>>> You call them terrorists, of course. How does this address what he
>>> wrote? He said that most of the Chechen fighters do not fall into this
>>> category - because they are attacking the Russian armed forces.
>>
>>
>> oh yes ,
>> Someone like this guerrilla fighters right?
>>
>>
>> 36 Killed in Train Blast Near Chechnya
>> Bomb Tears Through Commuter Train Near Chechnya, Killing 36;
Authorities
>> Suspect Terrorism
>>
> No, those are terrorists. You seem to struggle with this but it's very
> simple. If they deliberately target civilians they are terrorists. If
> they are attacking members of the Russian armed forces they are
> guerrilla fighters.
I don't agree. all these murders belong to the same gang.
The same Basayev's men kill soldiers as they kill civilians .
You can't call them today guerrilla fighters one day and the next day
terrorists because they have killed civilians.
bye
s
|
