John Secker <john@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:+SbnXUAsFS0$EwiX@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <aa1e2c49.0312050709.4eb7a285@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, John
> Pancoast <jpancoast@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
> >> A "terrorist" is technically someone who attacks civilian targets in
> >> order to spread mass fear. That wouldn't include most of the Chechen
> >> fighters.
> >>
> >> Scott ORr
> >
> >
> > Er, Scott, what ? Moscow theater, apartment complex, and now, the
> >passenger train come to mind.
> > All done by Chechens.
> >
> And this proves him wrong, somehow? He said that most of the Chechens
> are not terrorists, which clearly implies that some are; you cannot
> disprove his statement by pointing to a number of terrorist attacks,
> because he never denied that these took place, simply that they were few
> in number compared to guerrilla incidents against the Russian armed
> forces. Chechen fighters have killed about 5,000 Russian troops, far
> more than the number of civilians killed in terrorist incidents, which
> tends to suggest that Scott is correct.
> --
> John Secker
Lol. Whew, that was exhausting reading this doublespeak of semantics.
My
point is that there's plenty of Chechen terrorists too, they're not just
some glorified 'freedom fighers defending their sacred homeland',
especially
when who knows how many are even Chechen to begin with, let alone could
care
less about the situation.
But whatever; I wasn't trying to prove anyone wrong.........on a public
ng, whats the point, lol.
John
|
