by "Öjevind Lång" <bredband.net@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mar 30, 2008 at 10:24 AM
"Bob Terwilliger" <virtualgoth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i meddelandet
news:fsmttq$nj0$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Öjevind Lång wrote:
>
>> Seriously, killing units belonging to the other side on neutral ground
>> should quite simply be impossible, or else carry extremely heavy
>> penalties. I see intersting diplomatic possibilites that could be
include
>> din the game.
>
> Scenario: You see your enemy starting to pile up units on your border
with
> a
> neutral country. Why SHOULDN'T you be allowed to attack them? Why should
> your enemy be allowed to accumulate his forces with impunity? It's not
> like
> he doesn't OBVIOUSLY intend to attack you; you're already at war!
That's why teh AI oftend emands that you rbeak fof conatcts with their
enemy - it's so the enemy can't exploit the Open Borders agreement to
send
troops through. But in real lfie, attacks om enemy troops on neutral
territory has always been regarded as a serious transgression in real
life.
Typically, it led the host country to join the other side in the war.
Öjevind
