Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Civilization III > Re: compare Civ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 15 Topic 1731 of 1809
Post > Topic >>

Re: compare Civ4 to Civ3?

by BP <reply@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 27, 2008 at 06:01 PM

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 07:42:34 -0600, Jeffery S. Jones  wrote:

>  The game play is smoother with less micromanagement.  The issue of
>super-high corruption making cities worthless is gone, pollution
>doesn't affect the map, production overflows into the next item
>without loss, and more like that.

Those all sound like good things to me!

>  The AI is smarter, and I think that the game balance is better
>between units.  Beyond The Sword expansion does a lot to beef up
>peaceful operations, as well as war, and makes diplomacy nicer.

Those sound like very good things - I'm starting another thread about
some problems I have with Civ3 AI. Smarter would definitely be good!

>  As a scenario player, Civ4 offers advantages because its
>scenario/mod creation system is so powerful.  More like Civ2's,
>scenarios can go far from the normal Civ model into very different
>realms.  Between the Warlords expansion and BTS, you have a lot of
>very fun scenarios to try out.

Yay! Scenarios + modding = very very good - especially with good AI to
play against. Does the AI require much/any scripting to do special
things in scenarios, or is it able to handle most of what you can
throw in there? (My Viking scenario has a reverse-capture-the-flag
thing where you get treasures from conquest and take them back home to
cash them in for Gold, and the Civ3 AI has no clue how to do this...)

>  The higher graphic requirements and XP requirement aren't that bad
>-- any new PC won't have a problem running it.  The game is functional
>on relatively modest graphics (intel GMA900 for example, Nvidia 5200).
>More power means more details on screen, but at low detail, single
>unit graphics and animations off, it still plays the same way.

I never can keep track of the different graphics cards - my approach
is that when I or my kids get a game that won't run on the cards we
have now, I'll go out and buy whatever new cards are currently
available for about $100-$125 and that is usually good enough to last
us a few years.

Thanks for all the info, it sounds like I really need to get Civ4 (and
BTS) as soon as I have a machine upgraded enough to run it.
 




 15 Posts in Topic:
compare Civ4 to Civ3?
BP <reply@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-01-23 15:51:16 
Re: compare Civ4 to Civ3?
Eddie Grove <eddiegrov  2008-01-23 17:35:14 
Re: compare Civ4 to Civ3?
Afoklala <afoklala@[EM  2008-01-24 09:21:28 
Re: compare Civ4 to Civ3?
BP <reply@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-01-27 17:51:29 
Re: compare Civ4 to Civ3?
Paul Hyett <pah@[EMAIL  2008-01-24 09:43:55 
Re: compare Civ4 to Civ3?
BP <reply@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-01-27 17:53:37 
Re: compare Civ4 to Civ3?
Jeffery S. Jones <jeff  2008-01-26 07:42:34 
Re: compare Civ4 to Civ3?
BP <reply@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-01-27 18:01:51 
Re: compare Civ4 to Civ3?
Jeffery S. Jones <jeff  2008-02-05 21:30:25 
Re: compare Civ4 to Civ3?
"Vladesch" <  2008-01-27 01:17:12 
Re: compare Civ4 to Civ3?
BP <reply@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-01-27 18:03:10 
Re: compare Civ4 to Civ3?
Paul Hyett <pah@[EMAIL  2008-01-28 08:35:50 
Re: compare Civ4 to Civ3?
Paul Hyett <pah@[EMAIL  2008-01-28 08:35:50 
Re: compare Civ4 to Civ3?
Wintermute <Wintermute  2008-01-28 10:16:59 
Re: compare Civ4 to Civ3?
Paul Hyett <pah@[EMAIL  2008-01-28 18:39:10 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 6 23:13:13 CDT 2008.