Op Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:51:16 -0600 schreef BP:
> I never bought Civ4, as I've been happy enough playing Civ3 Conquests
> and I had heard that Civ4 has higher graphics requirements and also
> requires XP. I was recently told that Civ4 is vastly improved over
> Civ3, but have not yet heard back on my request for further details
> from the person who said this.
>
> I never play Civ3 online, only solo or in multiplayer with my kids on
> our home LAN. I rarely play random maps, preferring the "Conquest"
> scenarios and a couple of custom scenarios that I have made myself. I
> rarely play in the modern age, preferring the Middle Ages or Age of
> Discovery.
>
> Any advice on what attractions Civ4 would have over Civ3 for me?
>
> Thanks,
>
> BP
I'm still playing Civ3 too, but I've tried out a demo of Civ4.
It's basically a different game altogether. Civ4 has so many new features
and aspects, that it's hard to make a comparison. I found Civ4 MUCH more
complicated (so many more buildings and advances and special abilities and
and and), which I didn't like. Also, Civ4 really needs a video card, my
computer has on-board video, which was not sufficient to give the game
what
it deserves. So I decided not to take that next step.
--
Jan Willem from Odijk, Netherlands
e-mail in From-field is wrong, real e-mail is:
jw point van point dormolen on xs4all point nl
(change point into dot, on into at)
And then there's this:
In good writing, for good reasons, under normal cir***stances, whenever
you
can, use prepositional phrases in limited numbers and with great caution.
|
