"Jeffery S. Jones" <jeffsj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:o744b3d4l4fdn69l1e4mmacc8g0shgkent@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is the AI really better? I'd like to think so, and it does seem to
> perform fairly well, without being quite as over-the-top as the
> Warlords patch. I'd guess it is a better balanced version of the
> Better AI project, which in itself pushed the AI effectiveness up,
> while still leaving it vulnerable at times to predictable
> overextension. OTOH, being unpredictable can mean making stupid
> mistakes, so it is usually better to err on the side of overkill.
>
> I haven't played enough to judge whether the AI will target cultural
> or diplomatic victories effectively (which Better AI attempted, and
> that AI could beat the human to a cultural win). But it does seem
It definitly pusues cultural. I jut got beaten by ghandi when i was easily
in first place and a few turns from launching my space****p.
I should have bribed someone to attack him, and used espionage against
him.
|
