Re: BTS comments

"Fishman ><(((°>" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:QIuri.297$ka7.244@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Öjevind Lång" <bredband.net@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:5h751oF3hbmkeU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "Nats" <nstutt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i meddelandet 
>> news:46ae3838$1_1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> "Öjevind Lång" <bredband.net@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>> news:5h1hoeF3irc2pU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>  But like many others, I often do not bother to play to the end.
Seeing 
>>>> what score I'll get simply doesn't interest me that much.
>>>
>>> Yes Civ 4 lost it for me. Just seems like Im playing a board game - no

>>> immersion for me. Didnt feel that bad with Civ or Civ 2 but then they 
>>> have got rid of all the fun bits now and introduced loads of daft
units 
>>> that are all the same basically. I got bored of the game quite quickly

>>> and have no interest in getting BTS.
>>
>> Too many people posting at Civfanatics.com seem to regard Civ as some 
>> kind of spreadsheet where the fun consists in milking the game for the 
>> highest possible score. They are the ones who always object to 
>> suggestions that the High Council or the throne room for Civ II be 
>> returned, on the grounds that they "would take resources away from the 
>> game". I feel differently, of course - the Council and the throne room 
>> were *fun*.
>>
>> Öjevind
>>
>
> Aye - Let's do lunch.... or  Build more military units.
>

Where I come from we don't fraternize with the enemy sir.... Do you?

Always made me crack up