Re: BTS comments

"Öjevind Lång" <bredband.net@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:5h751oF3hbmkeU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Nats" <nstutt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i meddelandet 
> news:46ae3838$1_1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "Öjevind Lång" <bredband.net@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:5h1hoeF3irc2pU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>  But like many others, I often do not bother to play to the end.
Seeing 
>>> what score I'll get simply doesn't interest me that much.
>>
>> Yes Civ 4 lost it for me. Just seems like Im playing a board game - no 
>> immersion for me. Didnt feel that bad with Civ or Civ 2 but then they 
>> have got rid of all the fun bits now and introduced loads of daft units

>> that are all the same basically. I got bored of the game quite quickly 
>> and have no interest in getting BTS.
>
> Too many people posting at Civfanatics.com seem to regard Civ as some
kind 
> of spreadsheet where the fun consists in milking the game for the
highest 
> possible score. They are the ones who always object to suggestions that 
> the High Council or the throne room for Civ II be returned, on the
grounds 
> that they "would take resources away from the game". I feel differently,

> of course - the Council and the throne room were *fun*.
>
> Öjevind
>

Aye - Let's do lunch.... or  Build more military units.