Dafydd Edward Dragon wrote:
> Lord Flame Stryke wrote:
>> Simon Richard Clarkstone <s.r.clarkstone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> news:-ImdnSVhPewDaWLanZ2dnUVZ8qPinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> http://oilcorner.deviantart.com/art/Baby-dragon-79538594
Thought
>>> But when it is possible to actually create one, will that be a good or
>>> bad thing? The novelty will wear off, they won't breathe fire, and
>>> their existence will destroy the magic of the myths. But then again,
>>> plenty of people think they're wolves or horses or some other mundane
>>> species like that.
>>> What do people think?
>>
>> OK, well, the magic of the myths won't die just because someone sees
>> one. At least, not for me. Even if I had one (and it would have to
>> be human-sized, and bipedal for me to even think of buying one, wings
>> would be nice, too (although not working ones, as then it would fly
>> away)) then the magic would just be stronger every time I saw it.
>
> ....?? why would you want one bipedal without working wings? why would
> it want to run away? Excuse me for jumping like this, but that sounds
> more like slavery than pet.
And if it is your pet then it must is less intelligent than you. How
intelligent will it be? Is slavery a bad thing for it?
--
Lkuznac Acigt-x :: Not exactly a dragon; not exactly an email address.
DC2.D"Kigdatsi" Gh L3.5m1.5t8w W~ T100g Phfwlt Sks,wl Cgr,bye+ B- Ar-
Fr Mr $- Fo R% Ac++ J+ S% U! I--# V---! Q+[RFT] Tc+++! E++
"%" = Unlike you, I not live as a human, and look human to no-one
|
