Lord Flame Stryke wrote:
> Simon Richard Clarkstone <s.r.clarkstone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:-ImdnSVhPewDaWLanZ2dnUVZ8qPinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> This is probably one of the best photo manipulations I've seen on
>>> Deviant Art:
>>> http://oilcorner.deviantart.com/art/Baby-dragon-79538594
>>> Thought others might get a kick out of it as well. Be sure to check
>>> out the link for the reference pictures to get an idea of how it was
>>> constructed.
>> But when it is possible to actually create one, will that be a good or
>> bad thing? The novelty will wear off, they won't breathe fire, and
>> their existence will destroy the magic of the myths. But then again,
>> plenty of people think they're wolves or horses or some other mundane
>> species like that.
>> What do people think?
>
> From my experience, they don't.
>
> .....
>
> Er, wait, you meant what do /I/ think about /your question/.....
>
> OK, well, the magic of the myths won't die just because someone sees
> one. At least, not for me. Even if I had one (and it would have to be
> human-sized, and bipedal for me to even think of buying one, wings would
> be nice, too (although not working ones, as then it would fly away))
> then the magic would just be stronger every time I saw it.
>
> Also, I don't consider dragons to be mythological to begin with.....
>
>
>
> Lord Flame Stryke
>
....?? why would you want one bipedal without working wings? why would it
want to run away? Excuse me for jumping like this, but that sounds more
like slavery than pet.
|
