Re: ShadowRun

Draco18s wrote:
> In article <o5ydndL7OP3cz1ranZ2dnUVZ8tHinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, 
> s.r.clarkstone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>> <rant>Certainly much better than my most-disliked premise for fiction: 
>> magic returning and technology stopping working.  It seems that the
laws 
>> of physics that make "technology" work are not the same ones that make 
>> life work.  Because technology has some magic "non-natural" stuff in it

>> so it isn't supposed to exist, whereas life is "all natural".  About
the 
>> only real excuse is that something has carefully thought, and ensured 
>> that life continues to work while things that it considers "technology"

>> don't.
>>
>> Now a story about robots taking over the world after all life dies off 
>> due to tiny changes in a physical field making the crazy hacks that
life 
>> uses rather less effective (the machines, being more orderlyly designed

>> were less reliant on the precise physics).</rant>
> 
> That doesn't make much sense.

Indeed.  I meant to write:

Now, a story about robots taking over the world after all life dies off 
due to tiny changes in a physical field making the crazy hacks that life 
uses rather less effective (the machines, being more orderlyly designed 
were less reliant on the precise physics), that I *would* like to read.

-- 
Simon Richard Clarkstone:
s?m?n_cl?rkst?n?@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "August 9 - I just made my signature file. Its only 6 pages long.
    I will have to work on it some more." -- _Diary of an AOL User_