On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 01:31:31 GMT, Anthropy <blah@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 17:47:08 -0400, Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 07:36:28 +1000, Little Kenny Fehrett
>><sodoff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>On 17 Sep 2005 19:20:22 GMT, Baldwin <BaldwinPark8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Have you looked in the mirror lately? You might change your mind about
her.
>>>
>>>Zinger of a response there. What next from you, Yo Momma jokes
>>>perhaps?
>>
>>How about an analysis proving your charge that Ehrett and I post using
>>the same computer? Your inaction is amusing and leading everyone
>
>Who is this "everyone"?
That would be the chubby old Czepiel cunt and her sockpuppet. She's
demonstrated her total inability to read headers in the past and she's
merely continuing to do the same now. She's BPD, the poor thing.
>
>>> tothe conclusion you are nothing but a poor embarrassed internet
>>>newbie. :)
>
>Hardly true since all anti's that know of you and some American's in
>antu believe yourself and Ken to be the same person. You cannot
>whinge about the accusation as you've been given ample opportunity to
>destroy the rumour yet you don't. All you have to do is post a current
>verifiable pic of yourself and Ken together and the rumour is
>scotched, gone for good but you don't and the obvious conclusion is
>because you can't. You're afraid a photoshopped image would be
>detected hence no pic.
>And there's no point whining on about Ron Tock and October. The pic is
>required now. If it is not forthcoming all wild speculation is valid
>and justified.
You think that the chubby old cunt will actually be able to support
any claim that she's ever made? There's always a first time, I
suppose, but this won't be it, lol.
|
