>On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:26:43 +1000, Little Penny Keret
><spankedoff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:19:07 -0400, Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:07:44 +1000, Little Penny Keret
>><spankedoff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:57:36 -0400, Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:18:21 +1000, Little Penny Keret
>>>><spankedoff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:32:44 -0400, Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yes I agree, Americans males are girly but only the gay ones.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Which explains why you claim to be a gay male model from New York.
>>>>>
>>>>>Which explains why you and Ehrett make a remarkable reappearance at
>>>>>exactly the same time, sockgrrr.
>>>>
>>>>You still haven't guessed right but keep trying like a good little
>>>>girl.
>>>
>>>So you're saying that you and your sockpuppet Ehrett didn't reappear
>>>at the same time? Posting from the same computer?
>>
>>Really? Show us your evidence. :)
>
>It's there for all to see. Care to learn how to read headers, dear?
Go ahead then, show us your evidence. :)
Let's see a comprehensive analysis by you of my headers today and
Ken's headers from the other day.
>>>The facts prove you a liar, but then you've never been concerned with
fact, have you you
>>>chubby old cunt :)
>>
>>The facts prove you're the liar. :)
>
>The facts show that you and "Ken Ehrett" made a miraculous reappearnce
>at exactly the same time, precisely as I stated. How, you chubby old
>cunt, does that prove that I'm a liar? Why, you sad old bint, do you
>persist in revealing yourself as a fool?
The liar is the one unable to back up his " posting from the same
computer " claim.
Prove me wrong. Show us your comprehensive header analysis.
|
